when asked about the emails indicating that scientists have been hoodwinking us about global warming:
"I'm sticking with the 2,500 scientists. These people have been studying this issue for a very long time and agree this problem is real," said Ms. Browner.
Yes, Ms. Browner, they have been studying the issue a long time, using data supplied by those scientists who have been intent on misleading the world about climate change for a long, long time.
About as cogent as President Obama vowing to reduce carbon emissions to save the world.
Since when is science ruled by consensus?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/25/climate-czar-says-e-mails-dont-change-anything/
"I'm sticking with the 2,500 scientists. These people have been studying this issue for a very long time and agree this problem is real," said Ms. Browner.
Yes, Ms. Browner, they have been studying the issue a long time, using data supplied by those scientists who have been intent on misleading the world about climate change for a long, long time.
About as cogent as President Obama vowing to reduce carbon emissions to save the world.
Since when is science ruled by consensus?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/25/climate-czar-says-e-mails-dont-change-anything/
Actaully the "2,500 scientists" were not scientists at all, or at least not climatologists. They were mostly bureaucrats. The UN IPCC was not a scientific body, it was a bureaucratic one.
ReplyDelete