Monday, November 30, 2009

The Looming Medicare Disaster


A Guest Article by my DH:

So you think ObamaCare may be a disaster in a few years? A real disaster looms in 3 months, not 3 years, when Medicare cuts the payment rates to doctors and physicians by 21% on January 1, 2010. The 21% cut in Medicare reimbursements mandated by Congress, and the similar cuts in commercial insurance reimbursements that would certainly follow, will be disastrous. Congress continues to embrace the delusion that physicians and hospitals can magically find some way to make up for a 21% cut in payments when even now hospitals lose money on every Medicare patient they treat and doctors break even at best.
If Medicare reimbursements are cut by 21% on January 1, 2010; on January 2 in order to avoid bankruptcy most physicians are going to be forced to decline to see any new Medicare patients; because from January 2 forward every single Medicare patient will cost doctors and hospitals far more than they can be paid for taking care of them. How long could any business remain open selling its products or services for considerably less than it paid for them? I honestly don't think that Congress has any appreciation of the magnitude of the crisis that looms. Medicare will implode three months from now because of their failure to act rather than five years from now because of the healthcare bill that the majority party is trying to push through Congress.

It is unfortunate, and in my opinion unconscionable, that Congress would make promises to seniors it has no intention of fulfilling and rather than face the inconvenience of raising taxes or cutting other expenditures has instead passed the cost of that program on to physicians and hospitals via reimbursements that at best barely cover their overhead. Tyranny of the majority is tyranny nonetheless.

Congress has just over a month to fix this, or at the very least kick the problem one more year down the road as they have for the last several years. If they do not do so, on January second Medicare patients will find it very nearly impossible to find a doctor. Initially they will blame physicians but ultimately they will, quite appropriately, blame Congress.

Sunday, November 29, 2009

Sunday Fun!


Iran's Snub


Iran is now planning ten new uranium enrichment plants, defiantly going against the United States, US allies, the International Atomic Energy Agency, and the United Nations.
This occurs just weeks after Iran was discovered to have a secret uranium enrichment plant in Qom, Iran.
And just after Iran's meeting with Britain, France, Russian, Germany and China in Geneva, where these major world powers were supposed to have Iran call a halt to its nuclear program (or at least set up some ground rules). It was not successful.
President Obama has promised to negotiate with Iran and offer a "hand of friendship", and thus bring about a diplomatic solution to this fiasco.
Iran's response to the "hand of friendship"? Rejection and ridicule.
Another unsuccessful move.
President Obama now wishes to continue to talk with other countries about what to do next. He sought to get China's help in censoring Iran, to no avail. The next meeting is set for Brussels, but officials don't expect any decisions or actions against Iran.
Are we planning another unsuccessful tactic?

Saturday, November 28, 2009

President Obama's Climate Czar


when asked about the emails indicating that scientists have been hoodwinking us about global warming:
"I'm sticking with the 2,500 scientists. These people have been studying this issue for a very long time and agree this problem is real," said Ms. Browner.
Yes, Ms. Browner, they have been studying the issue a long time, using data supplied by those scientists who have been intent on misleading the world about climate change for a long, long time.
About as cogent as President Obama vowing to reduce carbon emissions to save the world.
Since when is science ruled by consensus?
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/nov/25/climate-czar-says-e-mails-dont-change-anything/

Wow--What's Going to be Included in Government Health Care?


Abortions, that's for sure.
Tax incentives for businesses to cover same-sex partners (in the House bill).
Grants for states to counsel low-income families on child-rearing practices (a little overbearing, wouldn't you say?)
And, if Senators John Kerry D-MA and Orrin Hatch R-Utah has their way, government health care, and indeed all health care (since it will essentially be controlled by the federal government), will cover Christian Science faith healing.
Don't get me wrong, prayer works. (And so does medicine, which is where I differ from Christian Scientists.) But should insurance pay for prayer?
As the Cato Institute points out, when health care becomes part of the political arena, it becomes politicized.

Thursday, November 26, 2009

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

What Are They Going to Talk About in Copenhagen?


"ClimateGate", as many pundits have named it.
What is this? Why, just that leading climatologists from the Climate Research Unit at East Anglica University in the UK have been manipulating, forging and just plain lying about global warming.
So what? A bunch of kooky scientists off on some delusional rendevous about global warming?
Yes, BUT they are taking us with them.
This is the research that Cap and Trade is based upon, and for which we shall be taxed in all manner of ways to reduce global warming.
This is the research that governments around the world have spent billions of the world's money on, instead of other, more worthy (and real) causes.
This is why the Environmental Protection Agency has suppressed a dissenting scientist's work and opinions of its own researchers.
And yet this incredible news story hasn't been mentioned on ABC, CBS, NBC, or CNN!
So, What Are They Going to Talk about in Copenhagen, since global warming seems to be gone out the back door?

True Cost of Obamacare


Almost 5 trillion dollars.
So how do you manage to, well, pretend that this health care bill will cost only 894 billion dollars (or whatever the figure is--it's a lot--but five times a lot is a whole lot of money!)
You just conveniently leave out a whole lot of expenditures.
Like paying doctors adequately for Medicare--unless, of course, you are actually thinking of NOT paying doctors for their Medicare patients--at which point there will be no more Medicare doctors. Doctors can't just work for nothing, or less than nothing!
Or, making Medicare cuts. Ditto.
Or, just looking at the first ten years of government health care, collecting taxes for the ten years, but only spending money the last 6 years of the upcoming decade.
Bait and Switch?
From Heritage.org

Sold Out


Senator Mary Landrieu D-LA got her money for her "aye" vote on cloture of the Reid Obamacare bill.
Three hundred million dollars, to be exact.
She wasn't the only one to receive promises from Reid in return for a yes vote:
Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) got support his plan to expand eligibility for health insurance.
Senator Ben Nelson (D-Neb.) got rid of a provision stripping health insurers of their antitrust exemption.
It's just that Landrieu was the most blatant, money-grubbing example of wheelin'-n-dealin'.

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Friday, November 20, 2009

Miss Manners Would Be Appalled


Enough of bad manners!
Someone needs a slap on the wrist. Who in the world is advising our President on his manners?
Not only once, but twice!! bowing to another head of state.
It's simply not done.
Neither does one touch the Queen of England.
Nor does one hand out inane, cheap gifts to foreign heads of state. The Queen doesn't want your speeches on an IPod--she possibly doesn't even want an IPod. The Prime Minister doesn't want 25 movie DVDs that won't even play on English DVD players. One doesn't NOT have time for PM either. Nor does one NOT have time, with every other democratic head of state, to attend a major function celebrating the fall of the Berlin Wall.
One shouldn't miff every single ally in the world that one has.

Thursday, November 19, 2009

ACORN in the news again


ACORN is suing to get its government money back.
After all, the Los Angeles ACORN office, while not being terribly opposed to helping with a housing loan to support prostitution, Did draw the line when underage girls were mentioned.
But, oh yes, there's been a slight, well, downturn in the saga of ACORN.
The South Central LA office of ACORN has now been exposed as actually wanting to help the "prostitute" and the "pimp" in doing research into international sex trade for young girls and into money laundering for the sex trade.
Wow--I'm not sure what to say.
Except I'm shocked--SHOCKED--that these folks are President Obama's friends.

Quote of the Day


Senator Patrick Leahy D-Vermont on why terrorists can be tried in civilian courts:
“For one thing, capturing Osama bin Laden, we’ve got enough on him we don’t need to interrogate him.”
Nope, don't need to interrogate him and find out all sorts of good military intelligence to help save the lives of our troops--or even of Americans here back home. Nope, not at all.

The Stimulus Plan--Any Better News?


In a word---No.
Alabama received 3 billion dollars in stimulus money.
The result?
Increased unemployment.
As an example, the Fort Wayne Housing Authority spent $540,071 to create a grand total of 14 jobs to reroof apartments.
Even more astounding (nothing to do with Arkansas), the White House reports 6.4 billion dollars being given to 440 fake congressional districts. (Just so you know, the United States has a grand total of 435 congressional districts).
And just in case you're interested, the 6.4 billion dollars spent in the phony districts created 30,000 phony jobs, which amounts to $225,000 per phony job.
Could the White House be making up lots of phony numbers?
But my question--where did the money go?

Senate Vote, Here We Come


Time to contact your Senators.
Senator Reid hopes to have a vote this Saturday.
Folks to call:
Go to http://www.marklevinshow.com/Article.asp?id=1595660&spid=32364 to click directly to these Senators' emails.

I believe that this bill is monstrous--
The cost is tremendous. Mr. Reid's bill imposes new taxes on insurance companies (which will increase our health premiums), drugs and medical devices (which will increase our costs), businesses (which will decrease our wages and/or lead to more firings or less hirings), and incredibly, will divorce Medicare taxes from paying FOR Medicare!
Our Medicare taxes (increased, by the way) will not go to support our Medicare--but go to a general fund--dare I say slush fund--for the federal government to spend.

Again, under Reid's plan, Americans who decide to have health insurance would go to jail! Of course, Mrs. Pelosi thought this was just fine and dandy.

Not only does the Senate plan cover elective abortion, the wording would diminish the conscience rights of those insurers who do not wish to cover abortion.

A public, federally-controlled insurance plan is part of this bill--which would result in most Americans losing their private health care coverage within 5 years.

Like I said, call/write/email the above people. Plus your Senator.

Catching Up: Terrorists on Trial


Moving terrorist trials to federal courts? How do I think this unwise?
Let me count the ways.....
1. Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has already pleaded "guilty".
2. This is an enemy combatant case--not a criminal case. The laws are different, and for a good reasons, which include the fact that war criminals have never been afforded the same constitutional rights of a US citizen. That's because war criminals are NOT US citizens--they have committed acts of war against our country, and are subject to international rules of war. Attorney General Eric Holder is wrong to move these men to US federal courts.
Now, is he ill-informed, politically movitivated or just plain dumb?--I'm not sure--you decide by his statement when asked if a war criminal's case had ever been placed into US courts. “I don’t know. I’d have to look at that. I think that, you know, the determination I’ve made…”

(And another question, Mr. Holder--why are some terrorists being tried by military commission but these 5 men are now to be tried by federal courts? What's the difference in these cases? Why couldn't they all be tried by military commission, or by US courts?)

3. The Guanatamo Bay prison facility is designed to handle the security issues associated with war crimes trials. New York City federal courts are not designed to handle these security risks. Despite Mr. Holder's assurances that security is and has always been a non-issue, New York City is now asking for federal money to specifically help with increasing security.
4. Military tribunals allow for interrogation and collecting evidence as part of how terrorists are treated. This isn't allowed in normal criminal proceedings. Will Mr. Holder's decision lead to these 5 terrorists' cases being thrown out of court? Will this decision hamper normal military interrogation in the future?

And, last but not least, when President Obama states that he expects these terrorists to 'hang' (so to speak), isn't he prejudicing the trial? How will jurists be found who are impartital--when our President is so blatantly biased?
My summary---dweedle-dee, dweedle DUMB

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

The Berlin Wall

Associated Press
Isn't it wonderful that the anniversary of the Berlin Wall falling is so near to our own Veteran's Day?
Yes! After all, the United States is supposed to stand for freedom and liberty--those principles upon which it was founded.
But it's way too bad that President Obama chose not to attend the 20th anniversary of the fall. He was invited to attend--but the White House decided "No".
Apparently, with the missile defense system for Poland and the Czech Republic nixed, and the wishy-washiness of making decisions on Afghanistan, It Just Wouldn't Look Good.
President Obama stated he was too busy to go to Berlin. So what did he do on Monday?
He was interviewed by ABC, had his daily briefings, went by a reception for the United Jewish Communities, and met with Prime Minister Netanyahu.
He did send a video, mentioning that "their (Germany's) American ally would be led by a man of African descent," but forgetting to mention President Reagan.

Veteran's Day


Today, we had a wonderful chapel at seminary in honor of Veteran's Day.
The color guard was firefighters, and then we sang the Star Spangled Banner and Taps was played.
Then we had a great talk on helping our veterans.
To whom we owe so much.
Think about it....what about those brave soldiers, who despite much dissension about fighting against the mother country, England, fought a desperate and almost unwinnable war for our freedom? What if they had said--oh, well?
Then, we fought a war amonst ourselves, to right a grievous wrong in slavery.
In the last century, we fought against despotic, totalitarian, and yes--evil---governments to free Europe and Asia.
Now, we fight against terrorist groups who have killed Americans, even on American soil.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Fort Hood


I really wasn't going to write about Ft. Hood, but besides the terrible tragedy that it truly was--it's also becoming incredibly political.
It seems that the murderer (not the alleged shooter--wow, what a delicate way of stating it!) was, at the very least, becoming more and more fanatic and leaning toward an extremist form of Islam. He made statements several times that were extreme enough to cause his fellow soldiers to complain to complain to superiors. He was briefly investigated a year ago for web postings to radical Islamic sites. He was distraught about going overseas. He had bought 2 guns, cleaned out his apartment, and said goodbye to friends.
At least the first three problems, together, should have alerted the Army that something was wrong. But apparently Political Correctness won out.
This is not fair to our troops. They deserve better than that.

Monday, November 9, 2009

Winning the Battle, Losing the War

This is my (and my wonderfully smart middle son's) opinion:
If the Republicans had voted against the Stupak Amendment (which forbids the funds in this Health Reform Bill to be used for abortion), the Health Care Reform bill probably would not have passed.
Why? Because some portion of the 64 Democrats who voted "for" the Stupak Amendment would then NOT have voted for the whole Health Care reform. The Health Care bill would have been defeated.
I would lay this all at the feet of Representatative John Boehner R-OH, House Republican leader and Representative Eric Cantor R-Va, House Minority Whip.
Goodness Gracious, what poor planning, sir!

Please consider writing Mr. Cantor and your representative and asking them about this amendment vote--

Republicans Voting 'Aye' on the Stupak amenment:
Rep. Robert Aderholt [R, AL-4]
Rep. W. Akin [R, MO-2]
Rep. Rodney Alexander [R, LA-5]
Rep. Steve Austria [R, OH-7]
Rep. Michele Bachmann [R, MN-6]
Rep. Spencer Bachus [R, AL-6]
Rep. James Barrett [R, SC-3]
Rep. Roscoe Bartlett [R, MD-6]
Rep. Joe Barton [R, TX-6]
Rep. Judy Biggert [R, IL-13]
Rep. Brian Bilbray [R, CA-50]
Rep. Gus Bilirakis [R, FL-9]
Rep. Rob Bishop [R, UT-1]
Rep. Marsha Blackburn [R, TN-7]
Rep. Roy Blunt [R, MO-7]
Rep. John Boehner [R, OH-8]
Rep. Jo Bonner [R, AL-1]
Rep. Mary Bono Mack [R, CA-45]
Rep. John Boozman [R, AR-3]
Rep. Charles Boustany [R, LA-7]
Rep. Kevin Brady [R, TX-8]
Rep. Paul Broun [R, GA-10]
Rep. Henry Brown [R, SC-1]
Rep. Virginia Brown-Waite [R, FL-5]
Rep. Vern Buchanan [R, FL-13]
Rep. Michael Burgess [R, TX-26]
Rep. Dan Burton [R, IN-5]
Rep. Stephen Buyer [R, IN-4]
Rep. Ken Calvert [R, CA-44]
Rep. David Camp [R, MI-4]
Rep. John Campbell [R, CA-48]
Rep. Eric Cantor [R, VA-7]
Rep. Anh Cao [R, LA-2]
Rep. Shelley Capito [R, WV-2]
Rep. John Carter [R, TX-31]
Rep. Bill Cassidy [R, LA-6]
Rep. Michael Castle [R, DE-0]
Rep. Jason Chaffetz [R, UT-3]
Rep. Howard Coble [R, NC-6]
Rep. Mike Coffman [R, CO-6]
Rep. Tom Cole [R, OK-4]
Rep. K. Conaway [R, TX-11]
Rep. Ander Crenshaw [R, FL-4]
Rep. John Culberson [R, TX-7]
Rep. Geoff Davis [R, KY-4]
Rep. Nathan Deal [R, GA-9]
Rep. Charles Dent [R, PA-15]
Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart [R, FL-25]
Rep. Lincoln Diaz-Balart [R, FL-21]
Rep. David Dreier [R, CA-26]
Rep. John Duncan [R, TN-2]
Rep. Vernon Ehlers [R, MI-3]
Rep. Jo Ann Emerson [R, MO-8]
Rep. Mary Fallin [R, OK-5]
Rep. Jeff Flake [R, AZ-6]
Rep. John Fleming [R, LA-4]
Rep. James Forbes [R, VA-4]
Rep. Jeffrey Fortenberry [R, NE-1]
Rep. Virginia Foxx [R, NC-5]
Rep. Trent Franks [R, AZ-2]
Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen [R, NJ-11]
Rep. Elton Gallegly [R, CA-24]
Rep. Scott Garrett [R, NJ-5]
Rep. Jim Gerlach [R, PA-6]
Rep. John Gingrey [R, GA-11]
Rep. Louis Gohmert [R, TX-1]
Rep. Robert Goodlatte [R, VA-6]
Rep. Kay Granger [R, TX-12]
Rep. Samuel Graves [R, MO-6]
Rep. Brett Guthrie [R, KY-2]
Rep. Ralph Hall [R, TX-4]
Rep. Gregg Harper [R, MS-3]
Rep. Doc Hastings [R, WA-4]
Rep. Dean Heller [R, NV-2]
Rep. Jeb Hensarling [R, TX-5]
Rep. Walter Herger [R, CA-2]
Rep. Peter Hoekstra [R, MI-2]
Rep. Duncan Hunter [R, CA-52]
Rep. Bob Inglis [R, SC-4]
Rep. Darrell Issa [R, CA-49]
Rep. Lynn Jenkins [R, KS-2]
Rep. Samuel Johnson [R, TX-3]
Rep. Timothy Johnson [R, IL-15]
Rep. Walter Jones [R, NC-3]
Rep. Jim Jordan [R, OH-4]
Rep. Peter King [R, NY-3]
Rep. Steve King [R, IA-5]
Rep. Jack Kingston [R, GA-1]
Rep. Mark Kirk [R, IL-10]
Rep. John Kline [R, MN-2]
Rep. Doug Lamborn [R, CO-5]
Rep. Leonard Lance [R, NJ-7]
Rep. Thomas Latham [R, IA-4]
Rep. Steven LaTourette [R, OH-14]
Rep. Robert Latta [R, OH-5]
Rep. Christopher Lee [R, NY-26]
Rep. Jerry Lewis [R, CA-41]
Rep. John Linder [R, GA-7]
Rep. Frank LoBiondo [R, NJ-2]
Rep. Frank Lucas [R, OK-3]
Rep. Blaine Luetkemeyer [R, MO-9]
Rep. Cynthia Lummis [R, WY-0]
Rep. Daniel Lungren [R, CA-3]
Rep. Connie Mack [R, FL-14]
Rep. Donald Manzullo [R, IL-16]
Rep. Kenny Marchant [R, TX-24]
Rep. Kevin McCarthy [R, CA-22]
Rep. Michael McCaul [R, TX-10]
Rep. Tom McClintock [R, CA-4]
Rep. Thaddeus McCotter [R, MI-11]
Rep. Patrick Mchenry [R, NC-10]
Rep. Howard McKeon [R, CA-25]
Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers [R, WA-5]
Rep. John Mica [R, FL-7]
Rep. Candice Miller [R, MI-10]
Rep. Gary Miller [R, CA-42]
Rep. Jeff Miller [R, FL-1]
Rep. Jerry Moran [R, KS-1]
Rep. Tim Murphy [R, PA-18]
Rep. Sue Myrick [R, NC-9]
Rep. Randy Neugebauer [R, TX-19]
Rep. Devin Nunes [R, CA-21]
Rep. Pete Olson [R, TX-22]
Rep. Ronald Paul [R, TX-14]
Rep. Erik Paulsen [R, MN-3]
Rep. Mike Pence [R, IN-6]
Rep. Thomas Petri [R, WI-6]
Rep. Joseph Pitts [R, PA-16]
Rep. Todd Platts [R, PA-19]
Rep. Ted Poe [R, TX-2]
Rep. Bill Posey [R, FL-15]
Rep. Tom Price [R, GA-6]
Rep. Adam Putnam [R, FL-12]
Rep. George Radanovich [R, CA-19]
Rep. Dennis Rehberg [R, MT-0]
Rep. Dave Reichert [R, WA-8]
Rep. Phil Roe [R, TN-1]
Rep. Harold Rogers [R, KY-5]
Rep. Michael Rogers [R, AL-3]
Rep. Michael Rogers [R, MI-8]
Rep. Dana Rohrabacher [R, CA-46]
Rep. Thomas Rooney [R, FL-16]
Rep. Peter Roskam [R, IL-6]
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen [R, FL-18]
Rep. Edward Royce [R, CA-40]
Rep. Paul Ryan [R, WI-1]
Rep. Steve Scalise [R, LA-1]
Rep. Jean Schmidt [R, OH-2]
Rep. Aaron Schock [R, IL-18]
Rep. F. Sensenbrenner [R, WI-5]
Rep. Peter Sessions [R, TX-32]
Rep. John Shimkus [R, IL-19]
Rep. William Shuster [R, PA-9]
Rep. Michael Simpson [R, ID-2]
Rep. Lamar Smith [R, TX-21]
Rep. Adrian Smith [R, NE-3]
Rep. Christopher Smith [R, NJ-4]
Rep. Mark Souder [R, IN-3]
Rep. Clifford Stearns [R, FL-6]
Rep. John Sullivan [R, OK-1]
Rep. Lee Terry [R, NE-2]
Rep. Glenn Thompson [R, PA-5]
Rep. William Thornberry [R, TX-13]
Rep. Todd Tiahrt [R, KS-4]
Rep. Patrick Tiberi [R, OH-12]
Rep. Michael Turner [R, OH-3]
Rep. Frederick Upton [R, MI-6]
Rep. Greg Walden [R, OR-2]
Rep. Zach Wamp [R, TN-3]
Rep. Lynn Westmoreland [R, GA-3]
Rep. Edward Whitfield [R, KY-1]
Rep. Addison Wilson [R, SC-2]
Rep. Rob Wittman [R, VA-1]
Rep. Frank Wolf [R, VA-10]
Rep. C. W. Young [R, FL-10]
Rep. Donald Young [R, AK-0]

Health Care Bill Votes

The following list is of those Democrats who bravely voted as their constituents asked them. They did not cave to other Democrats, Madame Pelosi, or President Obama. I'd like to suggest that you write a "thank you" note to these men and women for representing their voters.
(And, BTW, hanging on to their jobs!)

Democrats Voting 'Nay'
Rep. John Adler [D, NJ-3]
Rep. Jason Altmire [D, PA-4]
Rep. Brian Baird [D, WA-3]
Rep. John Barrow [D, GA-12]
Rep. John Boccieri [D, OH-16]
Rep. Dan Boren [D, OK-2]
Rep. Frederick Boucher [D, VA-9]
Rep. Allen Boyd [D, FL-2]
Rep. Bobby Bright [D, AL-2]
Rep. Ben Chandler [D, KY-6]
Rep. Travis Childers [D, MS-1]
Rep. Lincoln Davis [D, TN-4]
Rep. Artur Davis [D, AL-7)
Rep. Thomas Edwards [D, TX-17]
Rep. Barton Gordon [D, TN-6]
Rep. Parker Griffith [D, AL-5]
Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin [D, SD-0]
Rep. Tim Holden [D, PA-17]
Rep. Larry Kissell [D, NC-8]
Rep. Suzanne Kosmas [D, FL-24]
Rep. Frank Kratovil [D, MD-1]
Rep. Dennis Kucinich [D, OH-10]
Rep. Betsy Markey [D, CO-4]
Rep. James Marshall [D, GA-8]
Rep. Eric Massa [D, NY-29]
Rep. Jim Matheson [D, UT-2]
Rep. Mike McIntyre [D, NC-7]
Rep. Michael McMahon [D, NY-13]
Rep. Charles Melancon [D, LA-3]
Rep. Walter Minnick [D, ID-1]
Rep. Scott Murphy [D, NY-20]
Rep. Glenn Nye [D, VA-2]
Rep. Collin Peterson [D, MN-7]
Rep. Mike Ross [D, AR-4]
Rep. Heath Shuler [D, NC-11]
Rep. Ike Skelton [D, MO-4]
Rep. John Tanner [D, TN-8]
Rep. Gene Taylor [D, MS-4]
Rep. Harry Teague [D, NM-2]

And about the lone Republican that voted "Aye"-- Representative Joseph Cao of Louisiana--
Well, perhaps a brief note about this RINO to the Republican National Party would be in order.
The Republican party doesn't need any more "closet Democrats".
Actually, we don't need Republicans or Democrats in office. We need conservatives (which I define as fiscally conservative and pro-small government).

The next step? Well, writing/calling/emailing the Senate, of course!!

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Last Week for Mr. President


Monday, November 2nd:
Briefings
Speech at rally for congressional candidate Owens
Meeting with Swedish Prime Minister
Meeting with advisors
Tuesday, November 3rd:
Briefings
Meetings with German chancellor Merkel
Advisors
His All Holiness Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew
Secretary of Defense Gates
U.S.-European Union Summit
Wednesday, November 4th:
Economic and daily briefings
Ceremony for foreign ambassadors
Trip to Madison, Wisconsin to meet with students and speak on education
Hosts classical music evening
Thursday, November 5th:
White House Tribal Leaders Conference
Briefings, meeting with economic advisors, and meeting with Secretary of State Clinton
Meetings with Treasury Secretary, President of Botswana, and Congressional Hispanic Caucus
President Obama addresses nation on Fort Hood shootings:
Here's the transcript--

THE PRESIDENT: Please, everybody have a seat. Let me first of all just thank Ken and the entire Department of the Interior staff for organizing just an extraordinary conference. I want to thank my Cabinet members and senior administration officials who participated today. I hear that Dr. Joe Medicine Crow was around, and so I want to give a shout-out to that Congressional Medal of Honor winner. It’s good to see you.

My understanding is, is that you had an extremely productive conference. I want to thank all of you for coming and for your efforts, and I want to give you my solemn guarantee that this is not the end of a process but a beginning of a process, and that we are going to follow up. (Applause.) We are going to follow up. Every single member of my team understands that this is a top priority for us. I want you to know that, as I said this morning, this is not something that we just give lip service to. And we are going to keep on working with you to make sure that the first Americans get the best possible chances in life in a way that’s consistent with your extraordinary traditions and culture and values.
Now, I have to say, though, that beyond that, I plan to make some broader remarks about the challenges that lay ahead for Native Americans, as well as collaboration with our administration, but as some of you might have heard, there has been a tragic shooting at the Fort Hood Army base in Texas.

From ABC news, you may read these thoughts on "Obama's Frightening Insensitivity Following Shooting" http://www.nbcchicago.com/news/politics/A-Disconnected-President.html
'Nuf said.
Friday, November 6th
Briefings
Meetings with FBI Director on Ft. Hood shootings and Sec. of State Clinton
Visits Walter Reed Hospital
Meets with Congressman-elect Owens
Saturday, November 7th
Press briefing on Health Care
To Camp David

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Stimulus? What Stimulus?



It was a dark and stormy night, and the stimulus was .....
A little wet?
In Georgia, at the Community Action Council, supposedly 935 jobs were saved. Only problem is that just 508 people work there.
At Health and Human Services Administration for Children and Families, 14506 were reported as "saved". But apparently over 9300 jobs just had pay raises--they weren't "saved".
In north Chicago, the schools received over $4 million and saved 473 teacher jobs--but the schools only hire 290 teachers!
In the rest of Illinois, it's much the same for teacher jobs--for example, in Wilmette, the WH claims 166 jobs saved. The school officials say the number is "0", as in zero. In Kankakee, the number is given at 665 full-time jobs saved. "Impossible", says the school district, as they only have 600 jobs, both full and part time.
But the White House says it's okay to overreport on "saved" jobs, because that will probably balance out those underreported job saves elsewhere.
Got that? I'm glad they don't balance my checkbook!

Tuesday, November 3, 2009

Transparency At Work (We Wish)


Ah, transparency is going well....sorta.
Today, Senator Boxer D-Ca had planned to "mark" (or go over a bill to move the bill out of committee and put it forward for a vote by the whole Senate) the Cap-and-Trade Bill (otherwise known as the Kerry-Boxer bill, or S. 1733).
She was left in a basically empty room--the Republicans on the committee did not show up.
Why? Because the Republicans did not want to go over the bill and send it on to the Senate.
Why? Because the Environmental Protection Agency had not completed a total look at the economic consequences of this bill.
So? Senator Boxer is threatening to break the rules and go ahead with the "marking" anyway.
What rules? Those that state that at least 2 of the minority party in any committee must be present to "mark" a bill.
It's transparency all over the place....

And for more transparency----
Over a week ago, Senator Reid sent his Senate version of the health care reform bill to the Congressional Budget Office for scoring.
No one has yet to see the bill online. Additions have been made--and no one's seen the bill yet. Forty senators asked to see the bill--and no one's seen the bill yet.
Transparency is breaking out all over....

The "Manager's Amendment" for the Pelosi Health Care Bill (is this like the Manager's Special?)


at the local cafe?
Wish that it were....
This Manager's Amendment means that the House of Representatives has added amendments even before Bill 3962 goes to the floor for a vote.
This is how earmarks (or payoffs, you might say) will be added to Mrs. Pelosi's health care bill.
The first amendment gives $6 billion to Medicaid for nursing homes.
Usually, Medicaid payments to nursing homes must be matched by state funds.
This is different--no state funds will be used.
And to make it even MORE different--the Secretary of Health will make these decisions without input by the states--AND Secretary Sebelius will not have to abide by any rules to make these awards AND her decisions will not be subject to review AND she won't have to tell anyone (except a few members of Congress) about her decisions.
So, payoffs without any guilt???? At least, without any recriminations.

And back to Iran


Well, dealings with Iran aren't going so well.
Iran isn't budging on its committment to nuclear--they promise to "think about it", but in talks a couple of weeks ago between Iran, France, Russia and the U.S.--nothing got done.
Which isn't surprising--anonymous sources in Iran had indicated that it would stall negotiations by sending junior officials who could not make decisions, thereby stalling for time.
How long will Iran stall? Or, how long will the U.S. allow Iran to stall?

Monday, November 2, 2009

Oh, and The Cost Increases

Funny, the bill for Mrs. Pelosi's bill is now placed 1.2 trillion dollars.
It's gone up 30 percent in 3 days.
Ten percent per day.
Wow!

The (Real) Numbers on Jobs


A picture is worth a thousand words--especially if those words are terribly misleading.
http://blog.heritage.org/2009/10/30/job-one-is-to-tell-the-whole-jobs-story/

Do Something about Health Care Bill!


Madam Speaker Pelosi's bill apparently is set for a vote this Friday.
Today, I sent off letters to all blue-dog Democrats in the House, stating that we (DH and I) would work to defeat him or her by monetarily supporting any conservative candidate if they voted for this bill.
Why is this so important to me?
First and foremost, I believe this to be an unconstitutional invasion of our rights and of our economy.
Unlike Mrs. Pelosi, this is NOT a trivial question. She replies with an incredulous "Are you serious?" Yes, Mrs. Pelosi, we, the people, are serious.
The Constitution is our rule of law. It is what makes our country a democratic republic, not a totalitarian or dictatorship government. And unlike many other countries which claim to be democracies, but don't actually follow their constitutions, we historically have followed our laws. Which makes us very special indeed.
You should be proud of living in the good ol' US of A.
Second, this will go a long ways to destroying our economy. Before you think this isn't nearly as important as our Constitution--think again.
Our freedom is based MAINLY on economic freedom. Because we can own our livelihood, our homes, our government (yes, we have the right to hire and fire our government leaders), our health insurance--we are free. Economic freedom is a cornerstone of a free democracy.

Call, write, do something to let your elected officials know your feelings.

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Followers