Friday, June 25, 2010
Goodbye for a while....
Thursday, June 24, 2010
Something Fishy in Chicago: The Blago Trial
Seems that perhaps Mr. Obama was aware of Blagojevich's desire for a Cabinet post in exchange for appointing Valerie Sterret as Senator to take Obama's seat in Illinois.
http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/blagojevich/2427402,CST-NWS-BLAGO24.article
While apparently just "knowing" of a crime isn't felonious in itself, how does this "smell"?
DISCLOSE Act Passes House Today
Wednesday, June 23, 2010
Further Episodes of "The Gulf Oil Spill"
No, I don't. But the federal government should provide to the governors of the Gulf Coast states all the help possible. including the best technology and know-how available to counter the biggest oil-spill environmental disaster ever.
Sunday, June 20, 2010
Oops, Mistake on the Gulf Oil Spill
The Jones Act restricts foreign vessels in US waters. According to both Democrats and Republicans, the Administration needs to waive the Jones Act temporarily and allow foreign ships to help with the oil clean up.
Friday, June 18, 2010
Mr. Barton is Right
President Touts Recovery in Ohio--Costing Us at least Half a Million Dollars
Iran Plans More Reactors
President Ahmadinejad said Iran will not make "one iota of concessions." "We set conditions (for any talks) so that, God willing, you'll be punished a bit and sit at the negotiating table like a polite child," he stated about the sanctions.
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2010/06/16/iran-tells-west-iota-concessions-nuclear-program-plans-build-new-reactors/
More "Whoa! Nellie!" Tidbits
Thursday, June 17, 2010
Whoa! Nellie! Watch out for the Constitution!
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
The Gulf Oil Spill: A Timeline
1994: The NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) crafted a plan for massive offshore oil spills: to round up the oil within fire booms and then burn it off. Some
experts feel this could have contained 95% of the oil in the current Gulf oil spill. Problem is, the federal government never purchased any fire booms. http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/opedcolumnists/where_was_plan_rlt5oDKad55hkqHe64BgqM
2008:
President-elect Obama promised that he would straighten up the Department of the Interior and the Mineral Management Service (part of the Interior Department). "I...want an Interior Department that, very frankly, cleans up its act."
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2008/12/17/AR2008121701589.html
Mr. Obama receives more than $77,000 from British Petroleum, the biggest recipient of their political donations ever. http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=6584A5A0-18FE-70B2-A838E6437FBEC75D
2009:
The Deepwater Horizon drilling rig was awarded a safety award by the MMS. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/04/transocean-deepwater-hori_n_563042.html
However, MMS apparently wasn't performing the proper oversight of drilling off our coasts, according to Vice-President Biden, who stated, "We’re finding out that the oversight was as bad as I thought it was in my career as a senator.”
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/05/vp-biden-were-finding-out-the-oil-drilling-oversight-was-as-bad-as-i-thought.html
In fact, the MMS had not been performing the monthly inspections on the drilling rig that it was supposed to do. The Deepwater Horizon rig also was operating without the required MMS safety authentications. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100516/ap_on_bi_ge/us_gulf_oil_spill_inspections
Yet, despite his claims to "clean up" the MMS, Mr. Obama left many of the top officials in their offices at the MMS--and the MMS gave BP a "catagorical exclusion" from the National Environmental Policy Act in April 2009. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/05/05/politics/washingtonpost/main6462513.shtml
2010:
April 20, 2010--The Deepwater Horizon drilling rig explodes, killing 11 crew members and releasing oil into the Gulf of Mexico.
The spill is estimated to be flowing at a rate of 1,000 barrels per day.
Mr. Obama attends fundraiser in Los Angeles for Barbara Boxer.
April 22--Mr. Obama hosts Rose Garden Earth Day reception. He then flies to New York City to push the bank regulation bill.
April 23--The Netherlands offers help in the Gulf oil spill catastrophe. The offer is refused.
April 24-26--President Obama and his wife Michelle have a weekend getaway in North Carolina (goft, hiking, dinners, and brunch)
April 26--President Obama hosts NY Yankees at White House.
April 27--President Obama flies to Iowa to tour.
April 28--Mr. Obama tours Missouri.
April 29--White House website updated with pictures of Mr. Obama and others working on Gulf oil spill. (Apparently the first mention by the White House of the spill).
Government scientists estimate the spill to be 5,000 barrels per day, using faulty calculation techniques. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/14/us/14oil.html
Mr. Obama attends DNC fundraiser.
April 30th--President Obama decides to NOT authorize new drilling off of Alaska and Florida.
May 1--President Obama enjoys Jay Leno at White House Correspondents' dinner and tries out some comedy routines himself.
May 2--Mr. Obama goes to Louisiana.
May 3--The President hosts the Navy football team at the White House.
May 5--Cinquo de Mayo celebration at the White House.
May 8--Golfing outing.
May 11--More golf.
Louisiana governor Jindal requests dredging to build 24 sand berms to protect fragile wetlands from the oil spill.
May 13--President Obama flies to Buffalo
May 14--Mr. Obama gives first speech on oil spill, in the Rose Garden.
Interior Secretary Salazar calls for a 6 month moratorium on Gulf drilling, stating that a panel of seven experts "peer reviewed" this recommendation and implying that the experts agreed with this decision.
Not so fast, say the experts. They don't agree with the moratorium; in fact, they are quite opposed to it. The experts, in fact, feel that stopping drilling is a bad idea---a six-month moratorium may lead to drilling rigs being sent overseas to other oil fields, potentially leaving older and more dangerous rigs here in the United States, and possibly stopping drilling for years. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/10/experts-say-obama-misrepresented-views-justify-offshore-drilling-ban/
May 15--More golf.
May 16--Still more golf.
May 18--Interior Secretary Salazar admits that the MMS has continued to give permits and environmental waivers since the moratorium announced on May 14th. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/24/us/24moratorium.html?pagewanted=all
Mr. Obama tours plant in Ohio.
May 19--State dinner for Mexican President Calderon.
May 20--Mr. Obama meets with Bono.
May 21--Mr. Obama meets with Pittsburgh Steelers.
May 22--I'll let you guess (hint--golfing)
May 24--Commandant of the Coast Guard, Admiral Allen, when asks if British Petroleum's efforts should be replaced by those of the federal government's, "Replace them with what?" http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/05/24/top_fed_official_on_pushing_bp_out_replace_them_with_what.html
May 25--The President goes to San Francisco to a party with the Getty family and to raise money for Barbara Boxer.
May 26--He visits in California.
May 27--After the President assured everyone that “the federal government is fully engaged and I’m fully engaged,” he is unsure whether the head of the MMS was fired or resigned on her own.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2010/05/27/breaking-mms-director-fired/?fbid=8JhVsdNxqCz
Then the President meets with the Duke basketball team and the World Cup soccer team, followed by a Memorial weekend getaway with his family to Chicago.
June 1--Back to D.C. to meet with oil spill experts.
June 2--Party with Paul McCartney.
June 4--Mr. Obama flies to Louisiana. Six sand berms are approved by the Administration.
June 5--Talk on oil spill that was recorded previously
June 6--President Obama hosts White House party and then attends theater.
June 8--Mr. Obama hosts BBQ for Congress.
June 11--Date night with Michelle with dinner and Broadway play.
June 13--Golf
June 14--Mr. Obama goes to Louisiana. The Obama Administration asks the European Union--twice now--to help with oil containment. Mr. Obama also accepts help--finally--from Canada, the Netherlands, Mexico, Norway and other countries.
June 15--President Obama holds Oval Office address. He appoints his 40th (give or take a few) czar to fix the Gulf oil spill.
June 16: The President speaks to British Petroleum--for 20 minutes.
Friday, June 11, 2010
Iran: Subverting Sanctions
The Obama Administration has promised that they will impose tough sanctions on Iran for continuing to ramp up their nuclear program and enrich their uranium supplies.
However, despite all previous promises and statements about implementing these "tough sanctions", the White House is now working to ease sanctions against Iran, fearful of the anger of other countries.
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-iran-sanctions-20100611,0,5936318.story
Secretary of State Clinton promised in April 2010 that the the US will impose "crippling sanctions" against Iran if diplomacy did not work. http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6149692.ece
Earlier this month, on the eve of the United Nations Security Council vote on sanctions, Secretary Clinton promised that these would be the "toughest ever" applied to Iran.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/06/08/world/main6562893.shtml
The sanctions that came from the United Nations, however, were relatively mild and were poo-pooed by Iranian President Ahmadinejad who retorted, "These resolutions have no value ... It is like a used handkerchief that should be thrown in the waste bin." And from Iran's enfoy to the International Atomic Energy Agency, "Nothing will change. The Islamic Republic of Iran will continue uranium enrichment activities."
http://www.heritage.org/Research/Reports/2010/04/Iran-Economic-Sanctions-at-the-UN-Security-Council-The-Incredible-Shrinking-Resolution
Yet, President Obama is working to subvert even these mild sanctions in Congress.
Our First Amendment Freedoms
Update on Carbon
The Senate voted to overturn Senator Murkowski's (R-Alaska) resolution to take away the EPA's ability to regulate carbon emissions that might endanger public health.
There was quite a lot of discussion, as you might imagine. http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/2010/06/oil-spill-invades-epa-debate.html
Senator Barbara Boxer (D-California) associated the BP Gulf oil spill to the necessity of regulating carbon emissions. Senator James Inhofe (R-Oklahoma) repudiated the idea that the oil spill was related to the regulation of carbon emissions.
Senator Barasso (R-Wyoming) stated that Democrats were wanting to give up all Congressional oversite of the EPA (which is unnacountable to voters and only accountable to the President).
Senator Boxer replied that the EPA's scientists should be making these decisions.
The problem is that the EPA has been a political tool in the past.
http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=4776
http://www.examiner.com/x-9111-SF-Environmental-Policy-Examiner~y2009m6d26-The-politics-if-not-the-science-is-settled-at-the-EPA-Alan-Carlin-global-warming-and-trouble
The other problems?
First, global warming is not a proven science. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124597505076157449.html
Second, proposals such as in the Cap-and-Trade bills would have essentially no effect on our climate (even assuming that global warming is true). Climatologist Knappenberger from World Climate Report states that Cap-and-Trade would lower global temperatures less than one-fifth of one degree Farenheit. http://www.masterresource.org/2010/05/the-american-power-act-a-climate-dud/
And finally, the economic effects would be catastrophic to our country. New EPA regulations would cost businesses thousands and thousands of dollars---and hundreds of hours of work. And this is prior to the increased costs of energy that would occur with the Cap-and-Trade bill.
http://politicopolitico.blogspot.com/2010/06/cap-and-trade-guest-blogger.html
http://blog.heritage.org/2010/06/10/failed-epa-votes-undermines-economy/
Write Your Senators about Judge Chatigny
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
To Read and Ponder: "The Alien in the White House"
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703302604575294231631318728.html?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEADTop
Not "alien" as in from another planet; but "alien" as in a stranger, an outsider.
The contention of this article is that Mr. Obama and his administration are outsiders, aliens, from most Americans' way of thinking.
Ms. Rabinowitz states that Americans want as President "a man of them, for them, the nation's voice and champion." What we got instead was someone whose appointees spend their time "delivering the latest inversion of reality", and whose chief counterterrorism advisor believes that "violent extremists are victims of political, economic and social forces."
I would mention, in addition to this article, a President who appointed as safe school czar a man whose only action when approached by a 16 year old boy having sex with an older man was to wear a condom; a President whose "stimulus" program for jobs is a total waste of money but continues to praise a 10% (give or take a few points) unemployment rate; a President who apparently knew about the severity of the Gulf oil spill but only has had time for parties, speeches, and photography sessions with atheletes---but no time to talk to the head honchos at British Petroleum. Out of touch?
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
Cap and Trade: A Guest Blogger
I want to thank everyone here today at the Shreveport Bossier July 4th Tea Party for attending and showing your support for the Christian Conservative Movement known as the Tea Party. We are neither Republicans nor Democrats, but concerned citizens worried about our future and the future of our children and their children.
I hope to enlighten each of you with a few basic facts regarding the latest attempt by the Obama Administration to bring you the largest tax increase in the history of the U.S. under the misguided assumption that we alone, will cure the world of climate change. At least, this is what we are led to believe.
This newest boondoggle brought to you by our dear leader was originally known as the Cap and Trade bill or the Waxman-Markey bill. The name was changed recently due to bad press and is now entitled the American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009. It has the same ugly result that the original bill would have brought us, and is, in all practical effects, another scheme for the redistribution of wealth from our nation to under-developed nations of the world.
Interestingly enough, we are the only nation willing to bind ourselves to this hugely onerous destruction of capital and jobs...which brings me to my first quote of Thomas Jefferson speaking to Edward Carrington in 1787:
"If once [the people] become inattentive to the public affairs, you and I, and Congress and Assemblies, Judges and Governors, shall all become wolves. It seems to be the law of our general nature, in spite of individual exceptions”.
Last week, by a slim margin - 219 to 212 - the U.S. House of Representatives passed the so-called Cap and Trade Bill. This bill, now headed to the U.S. Senate for final action, is designed to “cap” greenhouse emissions and restrict “trade” with those nations that fail to meet certain standards in controlling those emissions. The overall goal for capping emissions is an 80% reduction in the release of Carbon dioxide, or CO2.
What is the pollutant known as CO2? It is more commonly known as the air we breathe or more specifically, the air we exhale. Trees and plants thrive on CO2, the air they breathe, and when they exhale, they create Oxygen. We as humans breathe oxygen and exhale CO2. CO2 is not a pollutant. It is a giver of life, just as Oxygen is. Without CO2, plant life would die. Without plant life, we could not exist. This is a very basic concept for us as citizens to understand. Why is it so hard for Congress and our President? Are they that stupid? Well, I guess they answered our question last week.
During the recent presidential campaign, this quote by Barack Obama was released, speaking on cap-and-trade: "Under my plan of a cap and trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket"--this coming from a man who belongs to the party who supposedly cares about the little person....which leads to my second quote by Thomas Jefferson:
"The human character, we believe, requires in general constant and immediate control to prevent its being biased from right by the seductions of self-love."
The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009, is a 1,400-page document consisting of a cap-and-trade program for greenhouse gas emissions, a federal renewable electricity mandate, and a suite of new mandatory energy efficiency standards; it will impose 397 new federal regulations and 1060 new mandates on an American public already overwhelmed by extensive federal regulation.
This bill is very restrictive to one of our most reliable methods of electrical production, coal fired power plants. By design, our electric companies can continue to produce power with coal; however, the environmental restrictions will be very expensive, as well as nonsensical in nature. Our electric utility will be forced to purchase “carbon credits” offshore to offset the released carbon derived from the burning of coal. This is very simply a push to take our money and send it overseas. In essence, the electric utility will pay for carbon credits that will allow them to continue to operate coal fired power plants in this manner. For example; a farmer in Bolivia or any country wishes to cut down trees or clear land for farming. Our utility will pay the farmer or his government to “not” cut down the trees and to leave them standing so the trees will capture the carbon released by our electric utility. Does this make sense yet? Who is going to check on the farmer later and ensure those trees are standing? I guess we’ll have to get a Carbon Czar for that job.
A goal of the Clean Energy Act, is to make it expensive to use fuel that emits greenhouse gases in order "to encourage people to make substitutions." The choices that industries, individuals and the government make will determine the cost of the policies. The target of carbon offset from this bill is 80% between 2010 and 2100 and it will have little or no effect on the supposed global warming crisis--Yes, the one we’ve all heard of for the last 10 years, and also the global warming crisis that has recently been signed off on by over 700 scientists and presented to Congress as “not a global warming event, but in fact what is occurring is global cooling.”
...The bottom line is that a reduction of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions of greater than 80%, as envisioned in the Waxman-Markey climate bill will only produce a global temperature 'savings' during the next 50 years of about ½ degree.
I would like to point out what a miserable embarrassment the passing of the bill will be in so many ways, besides the obvious fact that it is a job-killer and a burden for families; all in the name of reversing 'global warming' or 'climate change'. China and India, the world’s largest polluters, will not participate in the Clean Energy Act, and will instead end up being the recipient of many of our manufacturing jobs, and quite a bit of our money. Again, the redistribution of wealth from our society to under-developed countries.
According to the Congressional Budget Office, there will be a net loss of an estimated 800,000 jobs to possibly as much as 2,000,000 jobs. Haven’t we lost enough already? Isn’t 10% unemployment too much already?
But in defense of the job losses, the Obama administration claims this will lead to the creation of a new class of environmentally friendly jobs to take the place of those lost. The CBO estimates 0.5% (1/2 of 1%) annual job growth in this sector will occur in Green Technologies. In plain English, which by the way, is our national language; this means it will take 200 years to replace the jobs lost!
How does this affect us, as average citizens? The effects of the Clean Energy ACT will be fairly quick once implemented. According to the Congressional Budget Office, which often under –estimates by as much as 70% or more, concluded the following will occur:
---Gasoline for autos, and diesel and fuel oil, will increase at minimum 74%
---Utilities such as water, butane, electricity will increase 90%
---Food costs will skyrocket
---Your local government will run short on budgeted expenses, thereby looking for additional revenue in the form of more taxes.
---Local businesses will increase prices to offset increased operational costs
---If you have oil or gas revenues from investments or mineral rights, expect to see a decrease in revenues as consumption drops significantly. Remember, the price increases go overseas to other governments, not to our citizens.
Your electric bill will go up an average of $3160 per year per household.
How this affects you is really very simple and here are some very easy points to remember:
Once implemented the cost of a gallon of gas will probably escalate rapidly to $4.68 a gallon, diesel will probably hit $5.00 a gallon.
Your electric bill will go up an average of $263 per month. If your electric bill is currently averaging $120 per month, your new monthly bill will be $383 per month. Likewise, if you’re using $200 per month, you will be paying $463 per month. The unfairness is that, again; this is a redistribution of wealth. You are paying higher costs for carbon offset, a non proven pollutant.
Obviously this effort is being led by environmentalists who wish to hold our way of life captive and enact control over our very existence as a society. I hope I have enlightened each of you with a few basic facts regarding this latest attempt to destroy our liberty and our pursuit of happiness by the Obama Administration in their efforts to bring you the largest tax increase in the history of the U.S
With that, I will leave you with a few quotes from George Washington,
#1. I shall not be deprived ... of a comfort in the worst event, if I retain a consciousness of having acted to the best of my judgment.
#2. Discipline is the soul of an army. It makes small numbers formidable; procures success to the weak and esteem to all
#3. To contract new debts is not the way to pay old ones.
And finally, Let me leave you with a quote from another Great American, John Wayne: "Life is tough... It’s even tougher if you’re stupid."
Goofs of the Week
News of the Week: Debt, Taxes, Spending
Saturday, June 5, 2010
White House Politics??
The Economy, Again....
Followers
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(194)
-
▼
June
(21)
- Goodbye for a while....
- Something Fishy in Chicago: The Blago Trial
- DISCLOSE Act Passes House Today
- Further Episodes of "The Gulf Oil Spill"
- Oops, Mistake on the Gulf Oil Spill
- Mr. Barton is Right
- President Touts Recovery in Ohio--Costing Us at le...
- Iran Plans More Reactors
- More "Whoa! Nellie!" Tidbits
- Whoa! Nellie! Watch out for the Constitution!
- The Gulf Oil Spill: A Timeline
- Iran: Subverting Sanctions
- Our First Amendment Freedoms
- Update on Carbon
- Write Your Senators about Judge Chatigny
- To Read and Ponder: "The Alien in the White House"
- Cap and Trade: A Guest Blogger
- Goofs of the Week
- News of the Week: Debt, Taxes, Spending
- White House Politics??
- The Economy, Again....
-
▼
June
(21)